Sunday, July 31, 2016

French Minister to Speak at 'Parliamentary Blockchain Forum' in Paris

The founder and head of Philips Blockchain Lab is leaving the healthcare giant effective 1st August for new opportunities in the blockchain sector.
ADVERTISEMENT
Arno Laeven, who led a 12-person internal team which investigated how blockchain tech could be applied to healthcare, said he will be departing for "new adventures" in the industry, but declined additional comment. Laeven was formerly global IT innovation lead, before founding the Philips Blockchain Lab in January.
Laeven will be succeeded by Patrick van Beers, senior director of digital platform solutions at Philips Research.
The announcement comes as blockchain leads at major banks are continuing to depart for entrepreneurial opportunities. Barclays blockchain lead Simon Taylor, for example, revealed he would be leaving the UK bank for a new venture fund, 11:FS, in June.
Soon after, blockchain leads at JPMorgan, State Street and BNP Paribas were found to be exiting their positions for new roles in the startup space.
Philips has been early among major healthcare firms in investigating blockchain’s potential, first announcing it would explore applications in October, before formally launching an Amsterdam-based R&D lab for the technology in March.
Image via YouTube

Wednesday, July 20, 2016

UK Legislators Cast Critical Eye on Bitcoin and Blockchain

A committee of the UK House of Lords, the upper chamber of Parliament, struck a curious and at
times critical tone when discussing blockchain technology and its impact on finance and government.
ADVERTISEMENT
During an afternoon hearing of the The Economic Affairs Committee, members heard from academics and representatives of the blockchain industry, as well as Ben Broadbent, the deputy governor for monetary policy of the Bank of England. Lasting about three hours, the hearing demonstrated a mixture of genuine interest and skepticism on the part of committee members.
It was the first major committee discussion of the technology within Parliament, and follows a period of growing interest within the UK government to pursue possible applications.
In addition to Broadbent, witnesses who spoke included Digital Asset Holdings CEO Blythe Masters (who spoke via phone); 11:FS co-founder and director of blockchain Simon Taylor; Imperial College Centre for Cryptocurrency Research associate director Dr Catherine Mulligan; Gresham College professor of commerce Michael Mainelli; and PwC transformation and assurance director Lord Spens.
During his appearance, Broadbent discussed both the concept of a central bank issued digital currency – which he indicated is an evolving, years-long process – as well as the technology’s broader impact on financial markets.
Broadbent went on to frame the conversation about blockchain within a broader question of how financial markets should be structured at all, telling committee members:
"When you think of things on these scales, the benefits are clear and quite large, and so are the costs. And what I was really trying to say is, even though this is a very new technology, I think it's possible, once you think through, to realize that some of the big questions involved are very old, not to say ancient."

On bitcoin

Committee members asked a number of questions about bitcoin, though at times the digital currency was branded as "anonymous" (bitcoin is by design a pseudonymous system).
The topic came up when one member asked how the Bank of England would operate a central-bank issued digital currency.
Broadbent dismissed the idea that the Bank of England would use a similar model, indicating that any network, if it came to fruition, would be a permissioned one.
"We would never have a system like that," he said.
He elaborated on this point during the hearing, suggesting that market participants wouldn't want an open, permissionless system when asked whether financial institutions might use a bitcoin-like system to escape regulatory scrutiny Further, he indicated that financial system players would prefer one that includes oversight from regulators.
"I don't think that's what we would be most worried about, because I think people would want us involved," he added.

Doubts raised about welfare trial

One notable moment in the hearing came during the second of three sessions, when the topic of a welfare payments proof-of-concept developed for the UK government’s Department of Works and Pensions was criticized by some members as ethically unsound.
Committee member and former UK chancellor Alistair Darling was vocally critical of the move, echoing past concerns raised by privacy advocates in the country.
"It does raise an ethical issue as to whether the state should know if someone is spending money on one thing or another," he said.
In the back-and-forth that followed, Mulligan suggested that, according to her best knowledge, the proof-of-concept calls for an opt-in approach that wouldn’t require such oversight. That said, she conceded that there are privacy concerns that need to be worked through before such a system becomes production-ready.
Mulligan told the committee:
"There are, really, a number of profound issues that need to be looked at from a regulatory perspective, and also these kind of moral and ethical questions, it raises them, very large questions for our society if we wish to use these technologies."
For more details about today's hearing, check out CoinDesks's live blog coverage.
Image via Parliament

Nearly Half of All DAO Funds Withdrawn After Ethereum Hard Fork

Roughly 43%, or nearly half of all funds associated with The DAO, have now been withdrawn by
former project investors.
ADVERTISEMENT
The activity comes hours after developers on the ethereum network executed a hard fork of its blockchain, a network change meant to specifically reverse the failure of The DAO project and move funds tied to its compromised smart contracts into a new account.
Data from the ethereum blockchain shows users began removing funds in ether shortly after the fork. At press time, the address for the new smart contract shows 6.6m ETH (or roughly $80m).
This figure was down from the roughly 11.58m ETH (worth $145.2m) available in the original smart contract shortly after its creation. In total, 1,188 withdrawal transactions have been executed in the first six hours the funds were available, a figure that can be tracked more closely here.
Prior to its mid-June collapse, The DAO had an estimated 23,574 users who had purchased DAO tokens, and would therefore be eligible for refunds. Should the withdrawal transaction figures represent individual users, this would mean roughly 5% of DAO users have now received refunds.
That such a small number of users could withdraw nearly half of the smart contract's ether funds is not surprising.
Those funds were originally exchanged for DAO tokens during a crowdsale earlier this summer, and while the total The DAO raised was impressive, its number of investors was comparably small.
Previous CoinDesk Research analysis revealed the top 500 DAO addresses held more than 70% of all DAO tokens, while the top 50 held over 40% of the funds. Developers and individuals close to both the ethereum project and Slock.it, the startup that wrote code for The DAO, were also among those who held funds in the project, an issue that proved controversial in previous weeks.
Regardless, reports on social media indicate that users began pulling out their ethers this morning to a mostly positive response.
Block explorers indicate that not all transactions were successful, though errors were said to be unrelated to the contract design, attributable instead to errors such as the failure of those executing transactions to pay the necessary gas fees. Users were paying on average 1 cent to execute transactions at press time.
For more on the ethereum hard fork, read our full report here.
Pete Rizzo contributed reporting.
Coin bowl image via Shutterstock